Myths and Facts

Clearing up common misconceptions about a Casino Resort in Steuben County

Myth: We would be taking on a failing casino.

Fact : Ohio County leaders fought to keep the casino in Rising Sun, and relocation is no longer a part of the bill passed into state law.  A new casino license was created, with proposal bidding allowed by any licensed casino operator in the country.

Despite revenue declines due to nearby competition, The Rising Star Casino there has still been able to contribute over $6 million a year to Ohio County and local non-profits through Taxes and Local Distribution Agreements.  Further, in their 2024 Community Report, the City of Rising Sun notes that their share of riverboat casino revenues funds almost a third of the city’s annual budget.  Additionally, the Casino Resort is the #1 Property Tax payer in Ohio County.

Reactions to the news that they’d be getting to keep their casino were overwhelmingly positive in the community, with the Mayor of Rising Sun saying, “This has been a very long, ongoing process with both City and County officials making multiple trips to the State Capitol building throughout this whole legislative session to protect our constituents.”

Myth : This expands gambling in Indiana.

Fact : A license is eliminated. Relocation of a license was removed from legislation, instead, House Enrolled Act 1038 converts one of two unused horse racing “racino” licenses to an inland casino license while eliminating the other license.

The newly converted license is specifically for one casino operation awarded to a facility to be placed in Allen, Dekalb, or Steuben counties, while the Ohio County license also stays intact. The bill additionally states that if a licensed owner ceases gaming operations or goes out of business, the owner’s license is terminated.

Myth : This happened really fast without any community input.

Fact : Only the legislative process on gaming operations has occurred to date. Changes to the bill were day-to-day during the quickly moving session. This session began early and within weeks of the study release when local officials learned they would possibly be included.

Steuben County has worked to keep a seat at the table in this process so that the community would ultimately have the opportunity to decide if they would host a development of this nature. The Steuben County Commissioners have been dedicated to a public question on the November general election ballot throughout all of the discussion, and are working to bring factual and concrete information to constituents regarding a Casino Resort operation in the county in advance of the vote on Public Question #3.

A casino question and answer session and public forum are scheduled for Oct. 8, 2026. 

See the full timeline and details on our timeline tab.

Myth: A referendum always raises taxes.

Fact : A referendum by definition is “a general vote by the electorate on a single political question that has been referred to them for a direct decision”.  In this case it is a yes/no ballot question on allowing casino gaming in Steuben County.  While other referendums are tied to increases in tax rates to fund schools or special government projects, this ballot question would NOT be asking for a tax increase.  Local leaders won’t seek funds to subsidize a for-profit business.   

The ballot question is ‘Public Question #3’ and is required to read: “Shall inland casino gambling be permitted in Steuben County?”

Further, the referendum is binding. If the voters of a county do not vote in favor of permitting inland casino gambling, a second public question may not be held in that county. The commission may not issue a license to allow an inland casino to operate unless the voters of the county have approved inland casino gambling in the county.

Myth: This will eventually raise my property taxes or cost me money.

Fact : A Casino Resort is a private project that would fall in line with how other private developments are brought into our community.  We have no reason to believe there would not be the same positive financial impacts to infrastructure, emergency services, schools, and non-for-profits that are enjoyed by other casino communities.  This is why their partnerships are so sought after.

Casinos provide net decreases to tax payer liabilities not only through wagering taxes and local distribution agreement (LDA) dollars, but they are also the largest property tax payer in most of their counties. Casinos are mandated to pay portions of their profits directly back into the community and can actually off-set taxes paid by property owners. Wagering tax dollars are directed to the state, county, regional economic development, and in grants to local non-profits through Local Distribution Agreements in the host community.

LDAs from Indiana casino revenue have given additional funding to agencies like police and fire departments, YMCAs and community centers, schools, libraries, community beautification and environmental projects, and more.  Learn more under our ‘IN Casino Overview’ tab.

The estimated net benefit of casino gambling is approximately 2% of household value for households living near a casino.  Additionally, there are positive spillover effects to neighboring in-state regions and no significant costs to out-of-state border regions.  A particularly important finding for policymakers is that the benefits associated with a casino depend inversely on population density.  Casinos are more likely to create net benefits in areas where population density is low. (Source: Mike Wentz, The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics)

While this is a heavily regulated and heavily taxed industry, a Casino Resort is still a private development project.  It is NOT a government funded project.

Myth: A casino resort development would be offered property tax abatements that would shift a financial burden to homeowners and small businesses. The county wouldn’t recognize the fully advertised income from a casino because of these discounts.

Fact :  Tax abatements are entirely uncustomary for casino resort developments and have not been considered for Steuben County. Casino developers do not consider them in their projections or proposals as they would make for a less competitive bid. They are so uncommon in the industry that the only cases of tax breaks in the state are from a casino-affiliated hotel placed in a TIF district in East Chicago in 1999, long expired, and a 2009 federal tax credit for historic preservation in French Lick.

The 2026 House Bill on casinos, now HEA 1038, does not encourage or even mention abatements or tax incentives from host counties as opponents have suggested.

Casinos are almost always the highest property tax payer in their counties. Property taxes paid by casinos cover their infrastructure needs and more, allowing gaming revenue directed to the county to be net positive income. (See how much here )

Collections from a casino resort’s real property tax and personal property tax are NOT considered in the financial projections from the feasibility study. Property tax payments and Local Distribution Agreements contribute large amounts of additional financial support to a community outside of the gross gaming revenue taxes allotted to the county.

Myth: This will put a strain on our first responders and law enforcement.

Fact : Local distribution agreements give additional funding to these entities helping to pay for more staffing and equipment that can help all citizens. Police, Fire, and EMS services benefit from having casino partners in the community.

Examples of distributions in other communities have included: funds for new ambulances and EMS equipment, extrication equipment and fire truck repairs, police vehicles and personal protective equipment for officers, and even HVAC upgrades for emergency services facilities.

Our discussions with leaders in other casino communities in Indiana have revealed no concerns about increases in calls, and only positive impacts on these departments. Casinos also fund their own security, policing visitors with extensive rules and tight regulations on behavior within the casino property.

Learn more about LDAs, how they work, and more examples under the ‘IN Casino Overview’ tab.

 

Myth: We already have utility shortages and high bills and this will make it worse.

Fact :  Construction of a project of this size would require the expansion of capacity to our area, which utility companies have been hesitant to provide without the demand. A new casino resort could help increase capacity and create more reliable service to neighboring businesses, manufacturing facilities, and the homes of our residents. Despite their lack of authority over the companies that are granted territories in our area, local officials have been consistently relaying service issues to utility providers. They are ultimately governed by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission and state laws.

Local Distribution Agreement dollars by casinos in other communities have directly paid for utility improvements including things like electrical upgrades, new transformers, and sewer pump replacements.  They also have made large contributions to fund county comprehensive plans. 

 

Myth: We don’t have enough workers here to staff a facility of this size

Fact : A JobsEQ analysis was processed by the Steuben County Economic Development CEO in early 2026 that evaluated the employment needs for a Casino Resort operation that would bring 800-1200 new jobs to the area.

It looked at around 120 job categories and the potential applicants within a 45-minute driving distance, a standard labor shed pool. Categories included various hotel, entertainment, and casino workers like dealers, maintenance, food service, housekeeping, and security. A generally “ample supply” of candidates was recognized across most all of the job types required.

Myth: Exact location of a casino will be chosen by the Indiana Gaming Commission, with no local control over this decision if a referendum passes.

Fact :  Local authorities must offer a letter/resolution of support for each proposal that they want to move forward in the IGC bidding process, according to House Enrolled Act 1038. Elected officials can deny this support if they disagree with a location or any other part of an applicant’s bid. The County Plan Commission helps by establishing fitting locations through zoning that limits the distance from schools, churches, neighborhoods, and environmentally protected areas. It would also prioritize property that already has specific business zoning and good accessibility to interstates with established infrastructure, and an ordinance would require things like minimum property sizes and set-backs for construction.

The Casino operator with the winning bid on the license would submit proposed projects and locations based on their ability to purchase the land required. While real estate agents may advertise and discuss available properties with casino resort concepts, there have been no proposals with an exact site disclosed to local officials by any specific developers to-date.

Myth: We need an Impact Study.

Fact :  Local government officials cannot reasonably use tax payer dollars and bear the burden of proof to refute or confirm every claim made by citizens regarding broad construction and casino impacts. We are utilizing industry professionals, independent academic and peer-reviewed studies, empirical evidence from other communities, and economic development programs dedicated to giving insight on various types of businesses. This real research is being used for the projections shared on our website and social media.

Financial feasibility for a Steuben County location is a top requirement, and studies specific to our location have been performed under the county’s Economic Development Corporation, as are typical for any new industry wanting to locate here. 

Just like any other large development, environmental and infrastructure impacts of a casino resort will require a team approach once a proposal specifies the details of facility and an exact property for development. This will not only include local departments, but agencies like IDEM, INDOT, the DNR, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the EPA, and any other state or federal entities deemed necessary. They would ensure that a developer meets the standards required of any major construction project for things like traffic flow and nature protections.

See additional topics on our Community Impacts page.

Myth: We need other things in our community first – restaurants, youth activities in the winter, etc.

Fact :  Casino Resorts regularly include other non-gaming amenities including restaurants, meeting and convention spaces, spas, entertainment venues, and family-friendly recreation spaces like indoor pools/waterparks, bowling alleys, and golf courses.

Capitalism requires enough consumer demand to be profitable, and more stable year-round tourism and visitor traffic increases the likelihood that other for-profit businesses would see this as an ideal place to locate. Local officials cannot force companies to create new establishments here, however, visitors to a Casino Resort could help increase the demand for other amenities, making these community ‘wants’ materialize.

See “drawing power” and “spill-over effect” below.

Myth: People that come to the casino just stay in the casino and this will hurt independent local businesses.

Fact :  The non-gaming amenities included in a Casino Resort project attract visitors for business meetings and events outside of the casino itself. Studies have shown: “Casinos are found to have a significantly positive influence on retail property values.

The effect is stronger within a 5-mile radius of the casinos, suggesting that casinos have a complementary, rather than substitution, effect on other businesses.

This provides some of the first micro-level empirical evidence to support the “drawing power” of casinos and the impact of consumer spending on surrounding businesses.” (Wiley and Walker, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics)

The Positive Spillover Effects on Local Businesses: When casinos successfully integrate with their host communities, nearby businesses experience increased revenue and other new businesses are drawn to the area.
🟢 Increased Foot Traffic: Casinos are massive regional attractions. Nearby restaurants, bars, and retail shops often see an influx of customers, especially during major events, concerts, or weekends.
🟢 Hospitality and Tourism Boost: Local hotels often absorb the overflow of guests when casino hotels are fully booked. Similarly, local transportation services experience a surge in demand.
🟢 Property Value Appreciation: Commercial real estate values near a successful casino increase, and the area becomes more attractive for new business developments and investments.
🟢 The “Cluster” Phenomenon: Just as multiple restaurants thrive when grouped together, a casino can anchor an entertainment district, turning the entire zone into a destination.

Myth : Steuben County was not even identified as a good location in the state gaming commission’s study.

Fact : The study funded by the state gaming commission and performed by Spectrum Gaming Group in 2025 shows that the top two locations with the greatest potential are in the Downtown Indianapolis area and an area north of Fort Wayne. For modeling purposes, Spectrum chose easily identifiable points for each location, or what we call “proxy points.” It is critical to note that the identified proxy points are not suggested potential casino sites; they are proxies for development in the vicinity and are being used for Spectrum’s modeling purposes.  Northeast Proxy Point: Located at I-69 and SR 8, it was chosen for ease of access from Fort Wayne, the proximity of the Indiana Toll Road, and the potential for perhaps attracting visitors from Michigan. 

Steuben County is a northeast location that has both proximity to the Toll Road and Michigan.

In addition, an agreement between the state of Indiana and the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians prohibits new, non-tribal commercial casinos in 16 Northern Indiana counties to protect the Four Winds South Bend casino’s market. Known as the “16-county radius” restriction, this deal includes Kosciusko, LaGrange, Noble, Wabash, and Whitley counties specifically.  This only leaves Northern Allen County, Dekalb, and Steuben counties as Northeast options based on the study and current restrictions.

Myth : Once a project and license are awarded to an applicant, the county in which the project is located has to pay $500 Million in start-up costs.

Fact : The casino operator/developer is the ‘applicant’, not the county. The cost of the license is now $150 million. The investment in a casino resort would be a minimum of $500 million.  These are all dollars that would be paid by the casino developer, NOT by the county.

This investment minimum is in good-faith to the community and ensures that a new tasteful, modern facility will be built to house the casino versus placement in an existing storefront or the most inexpensive building possible. 

The investment would also include infrastructure upgrades and on-site non-gaming facilities such as a hotel, meeting rooms, restaurants, entertainment/concert space, and other recreation amenities.